Re: [Xotcl] XOtcl 1.3 bug

From: Kristoffer Lawson <setok_at_fishpool.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:45:21 +0300 (EEST)

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Gustaf Neumann wrote:

> Hi Attilio,
> if i would be Mr Spock, i would say "fascinating".
>
> The example can be simplified to:
>
> set pippo 1
> Object o
> puts [o exists pippo]
> Object o::p
> puts [o exists pippo]
>
> and was like this already at least in 0.9 (in 2001),
> most likely as well in all versions supporting "exists".

Oop, I think I noticed something like this too but forgot to report it as
I made a workaround. Bad me :-)

(Need to look at that segmentation fault thing again as soon as I have
time)
                               / http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/