No registered users in community xowiki
in last 10 minutes
in last 10 minutes
Re: [Xotcl] Request for XOTcl proc and var type ahead in tkcon
From: John McGlaughlin <jmcglaug_at_cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:30:13 -0400
That's correct Jeff,
I thought perhaps it might be possible but could see how it might be a
performance hit
cept on the dual opterons it is quite fast.
perhaps if it were to be implemented it could be a switch to enable it?
Though it sounds like there are no cycles for such a feature.
XOTcl is cool and becoming more popular.
Thanks
John
Jeff Hobbs wrote:
>John McGlaughlin wrote:
>
>
>>Can an extension be added to tkcon so that the interpreter becomes aware
>>of XOTcl proc, instprocs and associated vars for type ahead capability.
>>
>>
>
>tkcon only does the "first" level of expansion for procs. I
>assume you are looking for object instrospection that will
>expand methods and/or vars then?
>
>
>
>>Lazy,
>>
>>
>
>That I understand well. ;)
>
>Jeff
>
>
>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:30:13 -0400
That's correct Jeff,
I thought perhaps it might be possible but could see how it might be a
performance hit
cept on the dual opterons it is quite fast.
perhaps if it were to be implemented it could be a switch to enable it?
Though it sounds like there are no cycles for such a feature.
XOTcl is cool and becoming more popular.
Thanks
John
Jeff Hobbs wrote:
>John McGlaughlin wrote:
>
>
>>Can an extension be added to tkcon so that the interpreter becomes aware
>>of XOTcl proc, instprocs and associated vars for type ahead capability.
>>
>>
>
>tkcon only does the "first" level of expansion for procs. I
>assume you are looking for object instrospection that will
>expand methods and/or vars then?
>
>
>
>>Lazy,
>>
>>
>
>That I understand well. ;)
>
>Jeff
>
>
>