No registered users in community xowiki
in last 10 minutes
in last 10 minutes
Re: [Xotcl] Is this a bug?
From: Gustaf Neumann <neumann_at_wu-wien.ac.at>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:38:47 +0100
Dear Florian,
whatever you define as parameter for a class C is defined as a method
for Class C. This method can be only be specialized by some other
classes. This is
the same for all methods, therefore there is no exception for parameters. My
feeling was, that your misconeption was that a parameter is something
magic (e.g. not a method), but this is not the case.
best regards
-gustaf neumann
Murr, Florian schrieb:
>Thanks a lot for your thorough explanation!
>
>I tend to think in "invariants" and I memorized that having a method
>specialized this way
>
> C instproc someMethod {args} { next }
>
> should leave my program invariant with respect to functionality.
>
>But this obviously has the exception of getter/setter methods.
>
>Regards,
> - Florian
>
>
>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:38:47 +0100
Dear Florian,
whatever you define as parameter for a class C is defined as a method
for Class C. This method can be only be specialized by some other
classes. This is
the same for all methods, therefore there is no exception for parameters. My
feeling was, that your misconeption was that a parameter is something
magic (e.g. not a method), but this is not the case.
best regards
-gustaf neumann
Murr, Florian schrieb:
>Thanks a lot for your thorough explanation!
>
>I tend to think in "invariants" and I memorized that having a method
>specialized this way
>
> C instproc someMethod {args} { next }
>
> should leave my program invariant with respect to functionality.
>
>But this obviously has the exception of getter/setter methods.
>
>Regards,
> - Florian
>
>
>