No registered users in community xowiki
in last 10 minutes
in last 10 minutes
Re: [Xotcl] about Object's cset....
From: Gustaf Neumann <neumann_at_wu-wien.ac.at>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:23:01 +0100
On Monday 24 December 2001 21:15, Andriy Tkachuk wrote:
> I've just tried an new (last) version of XOTcl and get an amount
> of my XOTcl code errors, that there isn't such function as cset!.
>
>
> In http://media.wu-wien.ac.at/doc/ChangeLog I saw:
>
> 2001-09-16 Uwe Zdun <uwe.zdun_at_uni-essen.de>
> ...
> - eliminated "cset" on Object and from the distribution, seems to
> be nearly unused
>
> ...
>
>
> How did you estimate the unuseness!? :))
>
> On my mind, it was very usefull one,,, at last for me...
Well, here is the definition of cset.
Object instproc cset {vn arg} {
if {![[self] exists $vn]} {
[self] set $vn $arg
}
}
we tried to keep the core definitions small,
so it was dropped. sorry, if this hit you.
there are recently some discussions about more
powerful versions of set in the tcl community,
so i expect something more general to appear sooner or
later. so, if this tiny cset will be around in the
xotcl-core, more and more applications will depend on
it, and it should be made consistent with the more
powerful set methods....
A simple approach is to define a package named cset and import
it via "package require", but somehow this seems
like an overkill as well....
what are the general opinions:
- add it again to the predefined set
- add it as a separate package
- do nothing (hope for better "set" methods)
- others?
any comments?
-gustaf
>
> thanks,
> Andriy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xotcl mailing list - Xotcl_at_alice.wu-wien.ac.at
> http://alice.wu-wien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/xotcl
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:23:01 +0100
On Monday 24 December 2001 21:15, Andriy Tkachuk wrote:
> I've just tried an new (last) version of XOTcl and get an amount
> of my XOTcl code errors, that there isn't such function as cset!.
>
>
> In http://media.wu-wien.ac.at/doc/ChangeLog I saw:
>
> 2001-09-16 Uwe Zdun <uwe.zdun_at_uni-essen.de>
> ...
> - eliminated "cset" on Object and from the distribution, seems to
> be nearly unused
>
> ...
>
>
> How did you estimate the unuseness!? :))
>
> On my mind, it was very usefull one,,, at last for me...
Well, here is the definition of cset.
Object instproc cset {vn arg} {
if {![[self] exists $vn]} {
[self] set $vn $arg
}
}
we tried to keep the core definitions small,
so it was dropped. sorry, if this hit you.
there are recently some discussions about more
powerful versions of set in the tcl community,
so i expect something more general to appear sooner or
later. so, if this tiny cset will be around in the
xotcl-core, more and more applications will depend on
it, and it should be made consistent with the more
powerful set methods....
A simple approach is to define a package named cset and import
it via "package require", but somehow this seems
like an overkill as well....
what are the general opinions:
- add it again to the predefined set
- add it as a separate package
- do nothing (hope for better "set" methods)
- others?
any comments?
-gustaf
>
> thanks,
> Andriy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xotcl mailing list - Xotcl_at_alice.wu-wien.ac.at
> http://alice.wu-wien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/xotcl