No registered users in community xowiki
in last 10 minutes
in last 10 minutes
Re: [Xotcl] Sense or non-sense of version-numbers.
From: Zoran Vasiljevic <zoran_at_archiware.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:46:24 +0100
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 16:37, Adrian Wallaschek wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I do like version numbers, but there is a "too much" in everything.
>
The x.y.z is perfectly well adopted by the OS community.
In particular, most of the OS packages follow this
major.minor.patch versioning scheme, right?
> What is the deeper benefit of having the version number for xotcl
> recursively even inside the source-tree?
I see none, must admit.
> When running xotcl-1.0.1/xotclsh I do find ..../xotcl-1.0 in the auto_path
> instead of the required/expected .../xotcl-1.0.1.
This is, indeed, a problem which should be fixed.
Cheers,
Zoran
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:46:24 +0100
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 16:37, Adrian Wallaschek wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I do like version numbers, but there is a "too much" in everything.
>
The x.y.z is perfectly well adopted by the OS community.
In particular, most of the OS packages follow this
major.minor.patch versioning scheme, right?
> What is the deeper benefit of having the version number for xotcl
> recursively even inside the source-tree?
I see none, must admit.
> When running xotcl-1.0.1/xotclsh I do find ..../xotcl-1.0 in the auto_path
> instead of the required/expected .../xotcl-1.0.1.
This is, indeed, a problem which should be fixed.
Cheers,
Zoran