No registered users in community xowiki
in last 10 minutes
in last 10 minutes
Re: [Xotcl] XOTcl 1.1.0 publically available
From: Uwe Zdun <zdun_at_wuw.at>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:55:27 +0100
On Monday 01 December 2003 20:02, Jeff Hobbs wrote:
> > * New build system:
> > - per default no shells are built
> > - new configure switches eg. --with-xotclsh, -with-actiweb
> > --with-all
>
> Am I to understand this means that xotcl from CVS (or source)
> now builds in a somewhat TEA-compatible fashion?
> ./configure --with-tcl=...
> make
> make test
> make install
> and nothing but a stubs-based $tcl_library/../xotcl1.1/* is
> installed (perhaps with docs and demos somewhere)?
>
that's the intent of these changes. Per-default under Unix only the
XOTcllib with stub support is compiled. other (compiled) packages
must be activated with configure flags. under Unix we install:
libxotcl1.1.so
libxotclstub1.1.a
xotcl1.1/*
to /usr/local/lib. Under windows everything goes into xotcl1.1/*, including
libxotcl*.dll.
Having everything in xotcl1.1/* (also the libs) is no problem ...
its just removing a ".." from the generated pkgIndex.tcl file. It this an
issue?
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:55:27 +0100
On Monday 01 December 2003 20:02, Jeff Hobbs wrote:
> > * New build system:
> > - per default no shells are built
> > - new configure switches eg. --with-xotclsh, -with-actiweb
> > --with-all
>
> Am I to understand this means that xotcl from CVS (or source)
> now builds in a somewhat TEA-compatible fashion?
> ./configure --with-tcl=...
> make
> make test
> make install
> and nothing but a stubs-based $tcl_library/../xotcl1.1/* is
> installed (perhaps with docs and demos somewhere)?
>
that's the intent of these changes. Per-default under Unix only the
XOTcllib with stub support is compiled. other (compiled) packages
must be activated with configure flags. under Unix we install:
libxotcl1.1.so
libxotclstub1.1.a
xotcl1.1/*
to /usr/local/lib. Under windows everything goes into xotcl1.1/*, including
libxotcl*.dll.
Having everything in xotcl1.1/* (also the libs) is no problem ...
its just removing a ".." from the generated pkgIndex.tcl file. It this an
issue?
--
Uwe Zdun
Department of Information Systems, Vienna University of Economics
Phone: +43 1 313 36 4796, Fax: +43 1 313 36 746
zdun_at_{xotcl,computer,acm}.org, uwe.zdun_at_wu-wien.ac.at