No registered users in community xowiki
in last 10 minutes
in last 10 minutes
Re: [Xotcl] Re: gcc4 compatibility issue in xotcl-1.3.6
From: Kristoffer Lawson <setok_at_fishpool.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:16:18 +0300
On 1 Aug 2005, at 13:46, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
>
> The best fix is to remove twice the word "static" before
> XOTcl_ThreadExitProc.
> I've fixed this some time ago, when Tiger came out.. we should
> release most
> probably a maintenance release soon.
>
Hm, are nested functions a part of C99? If not, I would prefer to see
this moved to the top level. Strict ISO C adherence is something I
generally prefer.
/ http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:16:18 +0300
On 1 Aug 2005, at 13:46, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
>
> The best fix is to remove twice the word "static" before
> XOTcl_ThreadExitProc.
> I've fixed this some time ago, when Tiger came out.. we should
> release most
> probably a maintenance release soon.
>
Hm, are nested functions a part of C99? If not, I would prefer to see
this moved to the top level. Strict ISO C adherence is something I
generally prefer.
/ http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/